Editorial Policies

Manuscript Submission and Review

All manuscripts submitted to the Annals of Clinical Hypertension undergo rigorous peer review to ensure scientific accuracy and clinical relevance. Authors must adhere to the highest standards of research ethics and methodology.

Editorial Independence

The editorial board maintains complete independence in all publication decisions. Commercial interests, political considerations, or personal relationships do not influence editorial judgments.

Quality Assurance

We implement comprehensive quality control measures throughout the publication process, from initial submission through final publication, ensuring adherence to international publishing standards.

Conflict of Interest Management

All potential conflicts of interest are transparently disclosed and managed according to established protocols to maintain the integrity of the publication process.

Editorial Responsibilities

Our editorial team is committed to fair, timely, and constructive review processes that support the advancement of clinical hypertension research while maintaining the highest publication standards.